Specialist multi-disciplinary respiratory clinics housed within the primary care setting are cost-effective and can deliver significant improvements across several outcomes, UK study findings have shown.
Disease activity and healthcare utilisation were among the key outcomes significantly improved through the introduction of the MISSION ABC (Modern Innovative Solutions to Improve Outcomes in Asthma, Breathlessness and COPD; MABC) service, which was delivered in GP practices by a team of primary and secondary healthcare professionals and sat alongside usual care, researchers reported in BMJ Open.
“The findings were extremely positive,” lead researcher Professor Anoop Chauhan, told the limbic.
“A significant proportion of participants had changes in diagnosis, leading to more personalised treatments. This fine-tuning resulted in a sharp decrease in the need for emergency care, including unplanned doctor visits, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions. Interestingly, cost savings were also seen as the decreased need for urgent healthcare services balanced out the costs of improved medication and the running of the clinics,” said Prof. Chauhan, a consultant respiratory physician at Portsmouth Hospital, UK.
Aside from the benefit to patients and services, this new respiratory care model could also positively impact respiratory physicians’ workload.
“The MISSION ABC initiative is anticipated to change the workload for respiratory physicians, potentially easing the pressure in the long term,” he noted.
“By enhancing care through accurate diagnosis and effective disease management, the MISSION ABC approach could lead to fewer emergency interventions. While it may initially increase work to establish the clinics, it is expected to decrease acute presentations, allowing specialists to concentrate on complex case management and preventative care.
“However, it will be crucial to monitor these changes to ensure that the service integration is sustainable and doesn’t inadvertently increase workload elsewhere,” he stressed.
The model
For the study, MABC clinics – each consisting of two to three respiratory physicians, two secondary care respiratory nurse specialists, a physiotherapist, a respiratory physiologist, one or two healthcare professionals (HCP) from the primary care practice and an administrator – were set up in 11 GP practices.
Adults (n=441) aged 16 years and older with poorly controlled asthma or COPD or undifferentiated breathlessness not under specialist care underwent a range of assessments, including spirometry, oscillometry, FeNO, disease control, comorbidity questionnaires and breathing control and inhaler technique, through a carousel of stations for each.
Before leaving the clinic, patients were given a personalised self-management plan and information on inhaler techniques. Each case was then discussed by an MDT, with subsequent alterations to management plans as required, and patients were either discharged back to the GP, referred to another specialty, referred to an MABC investigation clinic, or booked in for further follow-up.
The monthly MABC investigation clinic also offered a “carousel assessment” of investigations such as echocardiography, CT scan, nasendoscopy and detailed body plethysmography to determine whether patients should be referred to specialist care or discharged to primary care.
The results
After a follow-up of 12 months, the results showed that MABC assessments led to changes in diagnosis for 17% of participants with asthma (n=47) and COPD (n=17) and treatment adjustments for 57%.