Lung cancer classification should go further and distinguish between multiple extrathoracic metastases at a single organ system and those involving multiple organ systems, an Australian-led international expert group has recommended.
It follows an analysis conducted by the team, led by Professor Kwun Fong from the Prince Charles Hospital and the University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, Brisbane, on all metastatic categories ahead of the forthcoming ninth edition of the tumour, node, and metastasis (TNM) Classification of Lung Cancer.
The current descriptors developed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) include M1a, M1b (single metastatic lesion), and M1c (multiple extrathoracic metastases in either a single organ or multiple organ systems).
However, writing in the Journal of Thoracic Oncology [link here], the researchers said further refinements were needed to improve capacity to indicate prognosis, considering the emergence of metastasis-directed therapies and immunotherapy.
These included two new definitions that divided M1c into:
- M1c1 (multiple extrathoracic metastases in a single organ system)
- M1c2 (multiple extrathoracic metastasis in several organ systems)
They drew from a database of 124,581 patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2019 with follow-up data until December 2021, of which 14,937 cases with NSCLC in stage IVA-IVB were available for analysis. This was a much larger dataset than the 8th edition’s, particularly with respect to the M category, the authors noted.
Multiple assessments demonstrated that patients with M1c who had metastases to a single extrathoracic organ system were prognostically distinct from M1c patients who had involvement of multiple extrathoracic organ systems.
The distinction was maintained after adjustment for potential confounders.
“Analysis of the much larger 9th edition database was able to demonstrate that the 8th edition M1c category consists of two prognostically distinct groups. Patients with tumours involving multiple metastatic lesions at one extrathoracic organ system (M1c1) have significantly better OS than patients with tumours involving metastatic lesions at multiple extrathoracic organ systems (M1c2),” they wrote.
“This was consistent in several statistical approaches and in multiple subset analyses. This is also consistent with external literature, albeit in a smaller retrospective cohort.”
“There is an argument for biological plausibility to support separating the M1c category into metastases at a single organ system vs multiple metastatic organ systems – the former could be expected to have a lower metastatic tumour burden and a better prognosis as suggested by clinical studies . Unfortunately, the current dataset did not allow us to adequately quantify metastatic tumor burden.”